Preface
Implementation of the planned motorway-like traffic project
would cross the Dresden Elbe Valley along its widest dimension
and would block the view over the historic Dresden skyline.
No traffic necessity for the “Waldschloesschenbruecke” anymore
There is no “traffic problem” in Dresden. Traffic
density in Dresden has been declining for years, last but not
least, due to the city’s demographic development, as has
been confirmed by official surveys. The average travelling speed
of motorised traffic is ahead of big cities across Europe, and
the relief on River Elbe crossings already now is higher than
that planned by the bridge project .
Today, there is no traffic necessity at the site for a new bridge
anymore. In the former years, larger residential areas next to
the business parks in the north of the city have been built.
For this and other reasons, the inner city traffic in Dresden
is declining. Thus, the analysis of Dresden City Council does
not state an appreciable traffic movement between the north and
the south-east of Dresden, which would require the “Waldschloesschenbruecke”.
The minor traffic movements are handled without problems by the
existing bridges.
On the other hand: There are fears the traffic facility might
become part of a traffic system which travels through the inner
city in order to connect the north and south motorways around
Dresden. With this system, an additional flow of traffic, including
significantly heavy goods-vehicle traffic, would be channelled
through the city centre. As such, the aim of relieving the city
of traffic congestion fails. Moreover, the project would have
negative effects on the structure and the quality of life in
the inner and outer areas of the city.
Huge traffic facility is planned inside the World Heritage
The current plans for the traffic facilities, „Waldschloesschenbruecke“,
indicate a four-lane fly-over, approximately 770 m long, spanning
the Elbe Valley. In the immediate area of the river crossing,
there is emphasis on two huge parallel steel arches. The 30 metre-wide
road is supported by 2 inclining pylons and at the ascending
Elbe hills in the north meets with a 1.2 kilometre-long tunnel
system, which was planned to connect the bridge with the road
network of the district „Neustadt“ and to enhance
accessibility. The tunnels turn into open ramps in the streets
of the bordering exclusive residential area, „Preussisches
Viertel“ (the Prussian Quarter). Indeed, one of the ramps
cuts directly into the meadows on the „Neustadt Elbe hills“.
For the „Altstadt“ Elbe bank meadows, motorway-like
roundabout entrances are planned.
Environmental Issues
The negative effects of the traffic project on the local ecology,
environment and recreational land-use are significant. A study
by the Dresden Office for the Environment proves that, compared
with other possible bridge sites, the site, „Waldschloesschenbruecke“,
has the most negative effects for both people and nature.
The Elbe
meadow is a completely unspoiled natural landscape. As a landscape
conservation area and as a part of a spacious flora-fauna-habitat
(Natura 2000) with a biotope compound, the area would be considerably
disturbed by a crossing traffic facility.
Despite all concerns brought forward by Dresden inhabitants and
citizens‘ initiatives,
the bridge project was approved by the authority in February,
2004.
Financial Issues
At 157 million Euros, the construction costs are the highest
charges ever estimated for construction of an urban bridge in
Germany. The construction costs would significantly eat into
the budgets of the Free State of Saxony as well as the City of
Dresden. The costs will affect other areas of public services
and will endanger cultural and social projects. Moreover, if
subsidised by the state, the costs will also negatively affect
the public transport system of Dresden. Additionally, the maintenance
of the bridge and its facilities will cost 1 million Euro per
year and it is still not clear whether this money will be available,
since the traffic system of Dresden is currently suffering from
poor maintenance.
The traffic plans clash with the values and aims of urban
architecture, landscape, environment and nature conservation
as well as the preservation of ancient buildings, the cityscape
and cost-efficiency. Even the main argument for the construction
of the connection, a reduction of traffic in the inner-city,
has been negated by a general recession.
The project contradicts
the requirements of a sustainable development of the cultural
landscape of Dresden Elbe valley. The necessity of the project
is questionable; as there is no doubt that the bridge would
damage the cultural image that is Dresden‘s heritage.
|